RENEWALCAST
  • Home
  • About
  • Convictions
  • Our Episodes
  • RenewalBlog
  • MB History
    • MB Confessions and Catechisms
    • MB History and Theology
    • MB Key People

ReNEWalBlog

The Difference Between Sola Scriptura And Biblicism

8/13/2024

 
​The Reformation solas (by grace alone, through faith alone, according to Scripture alone) are not well understood today. Yesterday, however, was the anniversary of Luther’s famous declaration at the Diet of Worms. Although already under ban for his teachings, Charles V had promised him safe conduct from Wittenberg to Worms.  When he arrived amidst great fanfare he was brought into the Imperial Hall in the center of which stood a table with his books.  He was asked if they were really his and if he was ready to recant.  He nervously asked for more time.  He was given a day to think.  The next day he was once again brought into the Imperial Chamber.  He began to debate.  He said the books were his but that they were all various in nature.  He began a long discussion about their contents. Eck, the Imperial theologian, cut him short and demanded that he answer candidly and “without horns” (without dialectic) whether he would recant.  Luther responded:
Since then your Majesty and your lordships desire a simple reply, I will answer without horns and without teeth. Unless I am convinced by Scripture and plain reason—I do not accept the authority of popes and councils, for they have contradicted each other — my conscience is captive to the word of God. I cannot and will not recant anything for to go against conscience is neither right nor safe.
The historicity of most famous words associated with the Diet (Imperial Reichstag) of Worms (“Here I stand. I can do no other. God help me. Amen”) is uncertain. What we need to understand, however, is what he said about the authority of Popes, councils, reason, and Scripture. Luther was no biblicist. What he was asserting at Worms was sola Scriptura (according to Scriptura alone) not biblicism. He was asserting the unique, final authority of Holy Scripture and the necessity of good and necessary consequences inferred from Scripture. He was asserting the perspicuity of Scripture, i.e., that Scripture is sufficiently clear that Christians, with the help of the Holy Spirit, are able to understand Scripture and to find what we need to know for the Christian faith and the Christian life. Westminster Confession of Faith 1.6 is a brilliant summary of what confessional Protestants mean by sola Scriptura:
​The Difference Between Sola Scriptura And Biblicism | The Heidelblog

Comments are closed.

    Authors and Categories

    All
    Brian Onstead
    Cessationism
    Chris Peterson
    Christopher Gordon
    Coalt Robinson
    Confessions
    Covenant Theology
    Discipleship
    Ecclesiology
    Eschatology
    Harrison Perkins
    Hermeneutics
    History
    Jay Wipf
    John Goodell
    J.V. Fesko
    Keith Mathison
    KIM RIDDLEBARGER
    Kristin Pichura
    Law/gospel
    Marriage
    Mike Abendroth
    Patrick Abendroth
    Perry German
    Podcasts
    Robby Clay
    R. Scott Clark
    Sam Parkinson
    Scott Muilenburg
    Steve Meister
    Tom Hicks
    Tom Wenger

About Renewal Cast

We believe that our minds are to be shaped and renewed by the life-giving and transforming Word of God through the power of the Holy Spirit - so we pray that as you listen you will see Jesus more clearly.

Useful Links

Home
About 
Our Episodes
Convictions
Blogs
​
Shipping and Returns

Stay Connected!

​We are always working on something new and exciting, so make sure to be the first to know!
© Copyright 2023. All Rights Reserved.
Photos from pmarkham, It's No Game, Bernd Thaller, Brett Jordan, Valkyrie Houti, fusion-of-horizons, wuestenigel, REM Photo, shixart1985 (CC BY 2.0), Évie., mendhak, Walt Stoneburner, zaphad1, Wonderlane, Go-tea 郭天, shixart1985
  • Home
  • About
  • Convictions
  • Our Episodes
  • RenewalBlog
  • MB History
    • MB Confessions and Catechisms
    • MB History and Theology
    • MB Key People